Language Support as a Scaffold AND a Stretcher

Carly Spina • January 18, 2024

Every student we serve is growing in language. When we plan for instruction that is linguistically supportive, we want to remind ourselves that language supports should center on both scaffolding upward and also stretching outward. When we plan for language supports that do both, we are better serving and supporting every student’s language needs.


Every single human being we come into contact with has their own unique language journey - even if it’s a monolingual language journey!  All of us have had experiences that have shaped and influenced how we language through reading, writing, listening, and speaking. 


As we serve and support students with their own unique language journeys and lived experiences that have shaped how they engage with language, it’s important to recognize that
these journeys and experiences also impact how we see ourselves and others as languagers. I never got into the field of EL/ESL/Multilingual Learners because I’m passionate about verbs, nouns, or vocabulary. One big piece of my passion in this work is that I want students to feel equipped to be powerful communicators as they navigate and exist between and across different spaces and places. I want them to feel confident and empowered as languagers! 


Because every adult teaches their content through language, all of us are, by default, language teachers. Since all of our students are growing in their languaging skills, all of them are language learners. Some of our students are monolingual language learners, and some are bilingual/multilingual language learners. This means that bringing language to the forefront will serve all students! 


One way to support students in stretching their language skills is to have students identify a role and an audience for their languaging tasks. For example, when students have to dialogue with each other, they can identify a role. For example, when doing partner work, they might consider: am I speaking to another 5th grade student right now, or am I speaking to a cosmetics company regarding the safety of their ingredients for young consumers? This will help to inform their language choices.

Another way to stretch students’ language skills is to make connections between “social” and “academic” vocabulary. Sometimes, folks want us to believe that “academic language” is somehow more valuable than social language. This is simply not true! Our students (and all of us) need BOTH social AND academic language to thrive in various contexts. We can liberate ourselves and our students from this belief that one set of languaging skills is superior. When we are teaching content-specific vocabulary or even technical vocabulary, have students make connections to other word choices that they might use. For example, I may use the word “rotation” when describing the path of planets around the sun, but I can easily link it to the word “spin” because that word is very familiar to me when I language with my peers. Creating space for those links is powerful! 

One final way to stretch language is to have students practice expression concisely AND in an extended manner. Students must be able to communicate in shorter genres (think of Tweets, social media posts, a headline, a thesis statement, a vision statement, etc.). Give students an opportunity to create a message in a “short” way and in a “long way.” It’s really powerful when students can see this side-by-side, like in a table that looks like the one below.


For a full set of templates like these, you can use this link for English and this link for Spanish. Recognizing that language support is not just about scaffolding upwards, it’s also about stretching outwards, will help us as educators to bring language to the forefront of what we do - and will help us to better serve all students!

Carly is a Thought Leader at IDEAcon 2024. Make sure to add her sessions to your IDEAcon schedule as you build it in the attendee hub.

Carly Spina has 17 years of experience in Multilingual Education, including her service as an EL teacher, a third-grade bilingual classroom teacher, and a district-wide Multilingual Instructional Coach. She is currently a multilingual education specialist at the Illinois Resource Center, providing professional learning opportunities and technical assistance support to educators and leaders across the state. Her first book, Moving Beyond for Multilingual Learners, was published in 2021 by EduMatch Publishing.

RECENT ARTICLES

Man in glasses, smiling, new blog post titled,
By Don Sturm November 5, 2025
Don Sturm reflects on finding a balance with tech in schools where the goal should be to use tech with purpose while teaching responsible use, not eliminating it.
By Betsy Monke October 29, 2025
This blog, written by an IDEA Mini-Grant recipient, discusses the idea behind using robots during reading lessons to support literacy and increase reading scores.
By Emily Vertino October 22, 2025
ChatGPT, a form of generative Artificial Intelligence, more commonly referred to as AI, popularized amongst students my freshman year of high school. My at-the-time English teacher was the first to notice that all of a sudden, freshmen—who had never taken a high school-level English course—wrote as advanced as a college professor. He pointed out that students who showed high school-level hand-written papers were able to properly use an em dash and focused on parallel structuring solely on their online assignments, a feat he had not seen in freshmen before. It became natural for teachers—from freshmen classes to senior classes—to connect that students using emdashes or specific words—delve, deep understanding, crucial, elevate, resonate, enhance, tapestry, foster, endeavor, enlighten—had used AI in their paper. After a few months of teachers reporting that students began scoring exceptionally well on papers, my school implemented an application called TurnItIn, ironically, another generative AI that reviewed paper and scanned for “proof” of AI generated text. The issue started once TurnItIn accused students who properly incorporated a citation into an essay plagiarized the text, ignoring all credit given to the original author and the research done by the student. Needless to say, we switched back to teachers reading papers and discussing with the students themselves if there was suspicion of AI incorporation and my school made a policy about “AI Academic Dishonesty”. Even amongst my peers in the classes with the highest rigor, there are countless kids who incorporate AI into their school work. Be it through having ChatGPT solve their calculus problem or Chemistry problem, AI is widely incorporated, which causes a noticeable shift in their critical thinking capabilities. Rather than spending thirty minutes struggling through a derivative problem on their own, they immediately refer to having ChatGPT solve it and copy the answer down, depriving them of critical understanding of the problem and the method used to solve it. General conversation is shifting too—my hallways are full of students misusing words or bragging about how ChatGPT landed them an A in a specific class. This isn’t to say I’m against AI—because I truly believe proper use of AI can be more beneficial than harmful—but as it is now, generative AI devices are damaging the development of my peer’s brains and there are dozens studies showing that generative AI, specifically Elon Musk’s Grok, is ruining the ecosystem of Memphis. I also find that the use of the resources around me has gradually decreased. When I was a freshman, my school used a center court to hold a resource center for all subjects—on top of every teacher having office hours for an additional 30 minutes after every day—and it quickly became a hot spot for students. I write fanfiction during my free time so I was actively inside the court, having English teachers proofread my work and discussing my ideas for the next scenes. I also went in to simply talk to teachers, but that’s beside the point. Each day I was in our resource court, it was filled with students coming in for support—be it math, English, science, history, or a language—and truly working on bettering their understanding of the subject. However, now, as a senior, we only have a math resource center (MRC) that operates full-time and a science resource center that operates during the first 40 minutes of a class. My school no longer has an English resource center for students that need help and for those who do, even office hours are a 50/50. As mentioned before, teachers stay for 30 minutes after school—with the exception of teachers who supervise clubs or sports—which is far too short for English teachers that have dozens of students coming in for English support. A select number of teachers introduced an appointment scheduling simply because of how busy their office hours are, while other teachers have students who only come in the day before a summative. The teachers I know became teachers because of their love for helping students, yet my peers are dismissing all help from their teachers in favor of ChatGPT, who isn’t even correct 100% of the time. This phenomenon occurs with reading, too. I’m an avid reader—most of my favorite novels have multiple volumes with hundreds of chapters (my all-time favorite has 1,400 chapters for the first book alone; the second book has another thousand), and a growing issue I’ve noticed as AI grows is that my peers use AI to summarize documents. For example, Connected Papers has been recommended to me by my closest friends and once I googled it, I found that it uses AI to web-browse for articles similar to a paper currently being read and labels key points that correlate to your current article. AI is useful; essentially, AI isn’t inherently harmful and there are proper uses for it, but the misuse of AI continuously outweighs the benefits. In the above instance, having a resource capable of easily accumulating sources in a similar field of interest shaves off time spent scouring online and leaves that time for additional revisions, which is beneficial, but the most common use of AI is completion, not assistance, when it should be the opposite.